MorganAtlanta;618528 wrote: There's nothing wrong with "wild caught" as long as it is done sustainably. What we need is a realiable way to know how the coral was collected. If people can derive value from the reefs through "gardening" coral, then the reefs have more economic value, and they stand a chance against other interests.
For example, if a proposed mine is going to put silt over a reef, but the mine will provide jobs and tax dollars, the mine is likely going to win out. But if the reef is also providing jobs and tax dollars, then it stands a chance.
If you give all your money to an aquaculture company that grows coral in the US, then the locals that could be making money sustainably collecting coral are going to have to go work in the mine.
Global warming is a whole 'nother problem, but don't let the threats from global warming scare you away from providing locals in the tropics with a way to make a living by conserving the reefs.
We reefers shouldn't get to high and mighty about this stuff anyway. If energy usage is at the root of global warming, and we use ridiculous amounts of extra energy to create artificial tropical reef environments in our houses, then we are the ones to blame for the whole thing...
So we are saying to the guy who used to make a living collecting coral... "We aren't going to give you any money for your coral anymore because your reefs are dying, but your reefs are really dying because we a pumping CO2 into the atmosphere from all the energy we use. That's okay. We farm our own coral now in Wisconsin and don't need your stuff anyway. Sorry pal. Go work in the bauxite mine because I need more aluminum for the heatsink on my new lights."