Seachicken;78750 wrote: I've been looking at this one:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=120159299276&ssPageName=MERC_VIC_RCRX_Pr4_PcY_BIN_IT&refitem=120149767817&itemcount=4&refwidgetloc=closed_view_item&usedrule1=CrossSell_LogicX&refwidgettype=cross_promot_widget">http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=120159299276&ssPageName=MERC_VIC_RCRX_Pr4_PcY_BIN_IT&refitem=120149767817&itemcount=4&refwidgetloc=closed_view_item&usedrule1=CrossSell_LogicX&refwidgettype=cross_promot_widget</a>
Any comments?[/QUOTE]
Our water here Is awesome, Less than 100 tds. That one will work, and if you use less than 200 gallons a month its hard to justify spending more.
Id check the membrane manufacture specs to see if it really gets 98% rejection. I think there playing a trick with words, not sure. You use to need a 75 GPD to get that high of rejection rate 96-98%.
You might ask if they can give you a 75 GPD Filmtec or GE membrane. your DI will last longer with the higher rejection rate membranes.
I use this one, slightly modified. They let me have the 75 gpd membranes instead. I like the clear housings
[IMG]http://cgi.ebay.com/AQUARIUM-2-110GPD-RO-2DI-REVERSE-OSMOSIS-water-FILTER_W0QQitemZ120160996039QQihZ002QQcategoryZ20756QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem">http://cgi.ebay.com/AQUARIUM-2-110GPD-RO-2DI-REVERSE-OSMOSIS-water-FILTER_W0QQitemZ120160996039QQihZ002QQcategoryZ20756QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem</a>