Magnetic vs Electronic Ballast

jead85

Member
Market
Messages
687
Reaction score
0
I am about to setup a 2x 250w DE setup. I have read that the light output is better on magnetic ballasts. Is this difference worth while? or should i just stick to a more efficient, cooler ballast.
 
jead85;532528 wrote: I am about to setup a 2x 250w DE setup. I have read that the light output is better on magnetic ballasts. Is this difference worth while? or should i just stick to a more efficient, cooler ballast.

what bulb are you going to run?
 
after continuing reading rit, i think i'll still go with what we had talked about. I just want to do any last research before i take the dive
 
I think the argument comes down to-
1) higher output
versus
2) higher efficiency

Magnetics <u>may</u> </em>win on #1, but
Electronics clearly win on #2

At the end of the month, what I care about as a consumer is value. Can I enjoy the hobby, supporting my corals, for the least amout of resource? I think #2 is more important in that regard.
 
In my case, my light fixture has 250W DE sockets and I can get nearly 400W of output using M80 magnetic ballasts. If I had it to do over again, I would run 400W bulbs on electronic ballasts. Electronics are more efficient.
 
Schwaggs;532668 wrote: In my case, my light fixture has 250W DE sockets and I can get nearly 400W of output using M80 magnetic ballasts. If I had it to do over again, I would run 400W bulbs on electronic ballasts. Electronics are more efficient.

Thank you! That is a perfect example in this classic argument.

You get less heat (waste) with the electronics.
 
Back
Top