Matrix

snowmansnow

Well-Known Member
Market
Messages
4,973
Reaction score
389
tell me about seachem matrix.

should I be using it as part of my biological filtration?

anyone with experience ?

Thanks,
B
 
I highly advocate using it.

Check out the seachem web page. I have a thread started about it, I think back in December or November of last year. Still using it, and it rocks!
 
Ripped Tide;803166 wrote: I highly advocate using it.

Check out the seachem web page. I have a thread started about it, I think back in December or November of last year. Still using it, and it rocks!

haha you're punny "it rocks"
see what you did there?

Edit: so basically just a flow through in my sump?
 
:) I'm glad you caught that.

I use mine as a substrate.... I'll dig up the thread in the morning... Food is about to get here.

showthread.php
 
I have 20 liters of it in the bio chamber of my MRC sump. "Supposed" to get rid of nitrates, as well as serve as a LR substitute regarding aerobic filtration for those wanting to do minimalist type aquascapes.

I have been testing for nitrate every week or so and have not seen any yet. Seems to be working. I can't say whether it works long term, as it has only been in use for about 1.5 months so far.

I think you will get the most benefit out of forced through flow, either in the water path through the sump or in a reactor or canister filter. All the water that enters my sump has to go through the Matrix.
 
I agree about the forced flow...


For the record, I have undetectable nitrates. The matrix bed is coming up on one year.
 
Ripped Tide;803175 wrote: I agree about the forced flow...


For the record, I have undetectable nitrates. The matrix bed is coming up on one year.

I hope that is the same for me.
 
We use it all over the place. Great stuff.

The only difference with the pond version is the larger particle size. They also make De*Nitrate which is the same material, smaller particle size.

One liter of Matrix replaces 10 gallons of traditional bio-ball media, and it's porous so it promotes anaerobic/anoxic bacteria as well, bio-balls can't do that.

We love this stuff.

Jenn
 
I use pond matrix same stuff as others said it is good stuff. Add some stability with it when starting a new tank you will be amazed how fast it will cycle.
 
JennM;803199 wrote: We use it all over the place. Great stuff.

The only difference with the pond version is the larger particle size. They also make De*Nitrate which is the same material, smaller particle size.

One liter of Matrix replaces 10 gallons of traditional bio-ball media, and it's porous so it promotes anaerobic/anoxic bacteria as well, bio-balls can't do that.

We love this stuff.

Jenn

Jen, is this basically the same stuff as Brightwell's NeoZeo, or is there significant differences?
 
eh.. the zeo is similar to the zeovit system... not something I wanna get wrapped up in again.

Looks like I'll be going with a dedicated reactor with matrix and dose a bacteria from the beginning this time instead of trying to add it to an established tank :)
 
I use it but would suggest going with the smaller size stuff as opposed to the pond matrix. (Unless you can put it in a reactor with massive flow.) The smaller particle size obviously provides more surface area and you can get away with it being in lower flow areas. (Non-reactor)
 
just thinking of a space save idea, could I use something like this?

ref=sr_1_424
 
mysterybox;803245 wrote: just thinking of a space save idea, could I use something like this?

http://www.amazon.com/Marineland-PC0250HSB-H-O-T-Magnum-55-Gallon/dp/B000260FVQ/ref=sr_1_424?s=pet-supplies&ie=UTF8&qid=1349540093&sr=1-424&keywords=canister+filters+for+aquarium">Amazon.com: Marineland PC0250HSB H.O.T. Magnum 250, up to 55-Gallon, 250GPH: Pet Supplies</a>[/QUOTE]

Seachem recommends using Matrix in a canister filter, so a HOT Magnum would be a good application. But, I think there is only about a two cup capacity in the media container, so I'd make sure you only need that much before you buy one. Otherwise, you might consider a media reactor instead.
 
Back
Top