Protein Skimmer TOO big?

ichthyoid;711804 wrote: If you do not understand the fundamentals, educate yourselves. Otherwise you will continue to rely on anecdotal information, heresay, inuendo, smoke and mirrors, etc. Direct observation is still our best tool, IMHO.

FWIW- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence</a>[/QUOTE]
Thank you. Some times I am sure that some think I just like to argue and I probably do, but I will ask why or how if someone expresses an opinion and/or an idea. I'm not even from Missouri but I still want to be shown. I want to understand why and how opinions or ideas are formed or the FACTS surrounding such. That said you arecorrect direct observation is still very effective. I guess my peve is when something is stated dogmatically or factual without an evidence to support the claim.
 
grouper therapy;711939 wrote: I guess my peve is when something is stated dogmatically or factual without an evidence to support the claim.

I love the internet.
 
grouper therapy;711952 wrote: ?:confused2:

I am agreeing with you. The whole idea of people can post anything they want to with no real data backing it. I like facts. Not opinions. That is all.
 
FF337;711967 wrote: I am agreeing with you. The whole idea of people can post anything they want to with no real data backing it. I like facts. Not opinions. That is all.
Oh yea ! What proof do you have that they do such. :lol2:? J/k of course.
No worries here.. I just did not get what you were saying :)
Some think that the more an individual posts the more they must know. Cracks me up,then you have the self proclaimed experts. there is nothing wrong with opinions as long as they are presented as such.
 
Which is exactly why I like to hear lots of opinions when I ask questions. Get one or two answers and it is pretty tough to tell who knows what they are talking about. Get 20 answers and it gets much easier weeding out the good from the bad.
 
Back
Top