- Messages
- 48
- Reaction score
- 0
So... I'm a little frustrated and confused (and having a lot of fun) as I try to parse the seemingly conflicting information I am getting regarding Live Rock, biological filtration, phosphates, nitrates, and the sump. I've been in the hobby all of 5 months and the best I can come up with are the following Two Disappointments and Seven Rookie Rules </em>
2 Disappointments<ol>
<li>Live Rock is great, but not for denitrification; and,</li>
<li>Phosphates that matter most can\'t be tested by what you can afford</li>
</ol>7 Rookie Rules</em><ol>
<li>Minimize food while adequately providing for the nutritional needs of the stuff you care about</li>
<li>Remove crap before it decomposes (skimming, for example)</li>
<li>Minimize anything that unintentionally collects crap, clean anything that intentionally collects crap</li>
<li>If you like being a farmer then have macroalgae, an algae farm, a DSB, etc. which will reduce *some* nitrates and phosphates but you better harvest it / tend to it -- because you like being a farmer, this should not be a problem.</li>
<li>Export the bulk of phosphates and nitrates via water changes</li>
<li>If you want a refuge for critters and the like, have a refugium for that reason alone</li>
<li>Run chemicals to remove excess nitrates and phosphates too the extent that #1 -#5 aren\'t adequate</li>
</ol>I am skeptical (and I am scared to say this publicly) regarding the notion that LR has denitrification value although it clearly has filtration value as it hosts a vast array of inhabitants which reduce crap to nitrates. I say this because I don't understand how there is enough water flow through LR to provide meaningful denitrification. http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2004-05/rs/feature/index.php">http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2004-05/rs/feature/index.php</a> raises a similar question while also pointing out that the growth of corraline algae and other coverings would further reduce water flow.
So I translate the above to my specific tank as follows<ol>
<li>The filter material at the entrance to my sump collects crap that I need to clean regularly but stops my sump from becoming a nitrate factory</li>
<li>My skimmer, the filter material and water changes do the most to export / eliminate Nitrate and Phosphate in my system and that\'s the way it is for nearly everyone</li>
<li>Purigen and /or chemipure are helping keep nitrates low between water changes</li>
<li>The LR in my sump (completely submerged) has only the unintentional value of being a refugium for the tunicates, misys shrimp and other bugs which has benefit to water quality (up to a point).</li>
<li>The LR in my display tank is a great host for a variety of stuff which help decompose crap to nitrates</li>
</ol>As far as I can tell, everyone removes crap directly, farms nitrate/phosphate eaters and exports nitrate/phosphates in the form of water changes, and every other filtration activity is essentially about how often one has to do water changes.
Someone set me straight, do I essentially have it or am I have I missed it
2 Disappointments<ol>
<li>Live Rock is great, but not for denitrification; and,</li>
<li>Phosphates that matter most can\'t be tested by what you can afford</li>
</ol>7 Rookie Rules</em><ol>
<li>Minimize food while adequately providing for the nutritional needs of the stuff you care about</li>
<li>Remove crap before it decomposes (skimming, for example)</li>
<li>Minimize anything that unintentionally collects crap, clean anything that intentionally collects crap</li>
<li>If you like being a farmer then have macroalgae, an algae farm, a DSB, etc. which will reduce *some* nitrates and phosphates but you better harvest it / tend to it -- because you like being a farmer, this should not be a problem.</li>
<li>Export the bulk of phosphates and nitrates via water changes</li>
<li>If you want a refuge for critters and the like, have a refugium for that reason alone</li>
<li>Run chemicals to remove excess nitrates and phosphates too the extent that #1 -#5 aren\'t adequate</li>
</ol>I am skeptical (and I am scared to say this publicly) regarding the notion that LR has denitrification value although it clearly has filtration value as it hosts a vast array of inhabitants which reduce crap to nitrates. I say this because I don't understand how there is enough water flow through LR to provide meaningful denitrification. http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2004-05/rs/feature/index.php">http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2004-05/rs/feature/index.php</a> raises a similar question while also pointing out that the growth of corraline algae and other coverings would further reduce water flow.
So I translate the above to my specific tank as follows<ol>
<li>The filter material at the entrance to my sump collects crap that I need to clean regularly but stops my sump from becoming a nitrate factory</li>
<li>My skimmer, the filter material and water changes do the most to export / eliminate Nitrate and Phosphate in my system and that\'s the way it is for nearly everyone</li>
<li>Purigen and /or chemipure are helping keep nitrates low between water changes</li>
<li>The LR in my sump (completely submerged) has only the unintentional value of being a refugium for the tunicates, misys shrimp and other bugs which has benefit to water quality (up to a point).</li>
<li>The LR in my display tank is a great host for a variety of stuff which help decompose crap to nitrates</li>
</ol>As far as I can tell, everyone removes crap directly, farms nitrate/phosphate eaters and exports nitrate/phosphates in the form of water changes, and every other filtration activity is essentially about how often one has to do water changes.
Someone set me straight, do I essentially have it or am I have I missed it