mapleredta;419026 wrote: Christine --->alt="" /> <--- you![]()
:lol2:
Priceless!!!!!:thumbs::thumbs:
mapleredta;419026 wrote: Christine --->alt="" /> <--- you![]()
:lol2:
LMFAO. I am the same way dude. No worries.:doh::lol2:rostato;419036 wrote: Priceless!!!!!:thumbs::thumbs:
ares;419044 wrote: the sump(or display) should not be so stagnant as to allow that to happen.
ares;419044 wrote: the sump(or display) should not be so stagnant as to allow that to happen.
grouper therapy;418813 wrote: You can plumb a bypass (safety drain ) at the point that the drain feeds the skimmer. just install a p-trap or s- trap near the skimmer inlet and if something obstructs the drain you have a safety check in place. I think it will work fine and is an economical way to feed a skimmer. Direct intake or the dirty water!!
dawgdude;418784 wrote: It's much easier to get a mj and be done with it IMO. When you tie into an overflow you have to put a valve on it to regulate the flow into the skimmer and I don't personally like restricting a gravity fed system.
johnr2604;419694 wrote: Great choice on the skimmer, I love my octopus and have used other more expensive skimmers rated around the same. The octo pulled twice as much out and gave me less problems. You are correct though that the recirc probably would not have fit in that small of a sump. Not because of the maxijet though as a matter of fact my maxijet sits right up under my recirc pump and adds absolutly nothing to the footprint.
au01st;419823 wrote: One more thought, if you hook directly to the skimmer from the overflow, what if you have a little fish go for a ride? Like a neon goby? Sushi anyone?
If you run a MJ out of the sump, doubt that would happen.
au01st;424320 wrote: Did the group buy start yet? Any discount on it?