Proven accuracy over time is why they get the nod from most long time reefers. You can find sporatic problems here and there with them, but overall they have a track record few others can beat.George;55869 wrote: Anyone want to actually elaborate on what makes Salifert worth all that extra money or what they feel makes them better? I'm not saying they aren't, just looking for perspective.
I've used Salifert kits for pH, Alk, and Nitrate in the past. I didn't see any significant difference to justify the cost. Even mail order, there's a 30% or so premium over a name like Seachem (which I use for most of my tests now). Ok, so it works out to maybe $50 a year, but that's not chump change.
I do think anything is better than those awful tests that used to come with the little foil packets (IO?) and I like the Seachem tests better than the Hagen ones.
triggerhappy8;55788 wrote: I definately second the Salifert recommendation. However, any test kit that is titration based (count drips until color change) will work as they are much more accurate than color match tests. Good tests to have: pH, alk, Ca, Mg, Nitrates. In my opinion you should have a test kit for every thing that you dose. No sense in dumping stuff in all willy nilly.
yea that is what i am doing and it is working for me but now that i dont have a coral i just look and see if my yellow tang looks stressed and then go and test it at the petco across the road from us. it works also. and i think that purple coral at ur bottom right will show u the most accurate.Cameron;55921 wrote: I am considering the no test approach to calcium, mag and alk. Corals and pH in my tank seem to tell me when something isn't right. I may try it for a month just to see.