Tips of SPS

mike oglesby

Member
Market
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
The tips on almost all of my Acros look burnt. Only about 1/8 inch each. No light change in the last year. I think I read somewhere what caused this but can't remember. Anyone have any idea.
 
Is it possible its accelerated growth your seeing? Sometimes when my SPS are growing really quickly they have a slight white tint to the tips as the tissue is trying to catch up with the growth. Just a thought
 
From what i have read, there was afew things could cause that. One reason it said Alk increase to quick. Another was nutrient to low. Keep in mind, these are just things i read from other post.Not sure on accuracy of statements.
 
too much alk for the nutrients present. up nitrate to 5ppm and have detectable phosphate (.02). - if alk is 11 or less

if that means killing the gfo go with it.

calcium carbonate is building faster than symbiodinium can keep up.

this can also happen with hardcore par too. like 800 par. but more than the tips would be whiteish. you would have pale looking colors. you can up the blue spectrum to clean that up.

i can actually replicate this phenomene in my own tank.
 
There are a variety of reasons, however lowering your phosphates with something like GFO in a reactor, lowering nitrates by water changes and/or carbon dosing and lower your Alk to 9 range.
 
Ralph ATL;1069358 wrote: There are a variety of reasons, however lowering your phosphates with something like GFO in a reactor, lowering nitrates by water changes and/or carbon dosing and lower your Alk to 9 range.

phosphates and nitrates never give white tips...

...ever

and you will never find one example of it happening either.
 
Russ-IV;1069364 wrote: phosphates and nitrates never give white tips...

...ever

and you will never find one example of it happening either.


Oh ok, I'm sure YOU know everything! :yuk:
 
Russ-IV;1069364 wrote: phosphates and nitrates never give white tips...

...ever

and you will never find one example of it happening either.

Why are your answers so definite ,
when there so many variables in this hobby ?.... just sounds like someone who was not kept Acropora for a long time?
Help me understand why you think you're so right about everything Russell
 
since most acros grow from the upper portions, when phosphate inhibits growth it stops growing and bleaching will usually occur, then algae.

here's a great article about this:

http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2006-09/rhf/index.php">http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2006-09/rhf/index.php</a>


I have personally experienced this numerous times myself and I have photo's, lol.
 
Ralph ATL;1069381 wrote: since most acros grow from the upper portions, when phosphate inhibits growth it stops growing and bleaching will usually occur, then algae.

here's a great article about this:

http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2006-09/rhf/index.php">http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2006-09/rhf/index.php</a>


I have personally experienced this numerous times myself and I have photo's, lol.[/QUOTE]

eh....
randy is right that it inhibits calcification but it doesnt cause white tips.
also it increases growth. the bone density is what lacks due to increased phosphate. It also calcifies to CaHPO4 rather than CaCO3.

[IMG]https://reefbuilders.com/2011/12/05/acropora-phosphate-growth/">https://reefbuilders.com/2011/12/05/acropora-phosphate-growth/</a>

[IMG]http://www.advancedaquarist.com/blog/increased-phosphate-levels-increase-growth-rate-in-acropora-muricata">http://www.advancedaquarist.com/blog/increased-phosphate-levels-increase-growth-rate-in-acropora-muricata</a>


white paper on symbiodinium and phosphate limitation

[IMG]http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/238/1291/193">http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/238/1291/193</a>

white paper on stylophora limited by phosphate

[IMG]http://jeb.biologists.org/content/214/16/2749.short">http://jeb.biologists.org/content/214/16/2749.short</a>

i could go on about this. none of them have white tips. the only thing corals generally get with nutrient enrichment schemes are greater sensitivity to temp and light swings which could allow them to expulse their zooxanthellae. Another side effect is brown corals due to lack of high powered light.

i personally dose both phosphate and nitrate. not just for growth and elevated alk, but so my corals do not die.

please dont take my response the wrong way. i just never heard of, or seen elevated nutrients causing white tips. infact. when i dose these nutrients in my tank the white tips turn the proper color, (mostly nitrate with elevated symbiodinium densities). there is a thread on r2r i created that has numerous pictures of the results. all disappeared white tips upon the addition of potassium nitrate. this occurs because in conjunction with phosphate, photosynthesis can occur.

was not trying to be rude. just informative.
i would also not overdo anything if you are attempting nutrient enrichment schemes. phophate should stay below 2mM (.2ppm) at all costs. and nitrate below 20 unless you are hitting 800 par at the coral from my experience. elevation of alk is highly recommended. (11 or so depending on severity)

ive seen bad stuff happen going beyond that no matter how clean my water was.

photosynthesis is also easier and more efficient with ammonium(fish waste) rather than nitrate mathematically as well

[IMG]http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpln.201000055/abstract">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpln.201000055/abstract</a>

while the latter is based on plants. the equation works for symbiodinium as well. I just cant find it while im getting ready for work

hth
 
So after getting in from work, i found the uptake of no3 and nh4 here...

http://www.int-res.com/articles/meps/68/m068p065.pdf">http://www.int-res.com/articles/meps/68/m068p065.pdf</a>

based on ammonium....

[IMG]http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00942117#page-1">http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00942117#page-1</a>

I am sorry, but i cannot find that formula I had, so you can just throw out what I said about ammonium easier to photosynthesize than nitrate as I really cant find it. Also it might be a bit presumptuous to even claim this as many corals consume nitrate and ammonium at different levels. I may have confused the equation with efficiency and it has no real-world application in our tanks.

sorry for confusion or retraction as I did not mean to mislead.
 
Ive had that happen a few times before.. and it is nearly always related to alk
 
You are basing your misinformation on strictly your "one size fits all theory" which is far from reality.


generally speaking, the higher the phosphates the higher the alk must be, so at say 10-12 dkh, then your growth actually does happen at higher ranges of phates.

what you are spewing is a very narrow point of view, with obvious limited exposure to SPS corals.

Acro's generally grow from the tips, so when phosphates are inhibiting growth, that's where it happens, hence the white tips followed by ALGAE.

In low bio-load sps tanks, then yes, you might need to actually add nutrients as corals do need minute amounts of phates to live. Low bio-load sps tanks are fairly easy...

However, if you have an extremely high bioload tank, then nutrient removal becomes more critical and less room for error as phates and trates can easily creep up without much notice. I feed my tank a minimum of twice a day for 20 minutes per feeding, but usually 3-4 upwards to 12 times a day.

In for my sps to thrive, I do weekly 40% water changes, change 2 cups of HC GFO & Rox 0.8 carbon weekly, 10 ml 100 proof vodkda daily, etc...
I keep my alk between 8-9. If my phates go over approx .08 growth begins to stop, etc. Also, if Alk would climb to ten, I would also get "burnt tips"

Zeovite tanks keep alk at 7.5 to 8 or they have issues.

So there is a correlation between phates and ALK, and also individually eith can make that happen.
 
http://www.reef2reef.com/threads/best-method-for-removing-nitrates-and-phosphates.232228/">http://www.reef2reef.com/threads/best-method-for-removing-nitrates-and-phosphates.232228/</a>


"This inhibition of calcification takes place at concentrations frequently attained in reef aquaria and may begin at levels below those detectable by hobby test kits. For example, one research group found that long-term enrichment of phosphate (0.19 ppm; maintained for three hours per day) on a natural patch reef on the Great Barrier Reef inhibited overall coral calcification by 43%.6 A second team found effects in several Acropora species at similar concentrations." Randy
 
Ralph ATL;1069559 wrote: http://www.reef2reef.com/threads/best-method-for-removing-nitrates-and-phosphates.232228/">http://www.reef2reef.com/threads/best-method-for-removing-nitrates-and-phosphates.232228/</a>


"This inhibition of calcification takes place at concentrations frequently attained in reef aquaria and may begin at levels below those detectable by hobby test kits. For example, one research group found that long-term enrichment of phosphate (0.19 ppm; maintained for three hours per day) on a natural patch reef on the Great Barrier Reef inhibited overall coral calcification by 43%.6 A second team found effects in several Acropora species at similar concentrations." Randy[/QUOTE]

my disagreement was white tips.

obviously too much phosphate will inhibit growth. this is not in question. all you did was confirm everything i said previously. numbers and all.

also.... the great barrier and caribbean reef is nitrate limited in growth... while reefs off south africa are phosphate limited.

i am surprised you can even hit 9 alk on a zeo system as that is pressing it for lns. My "narrow" view is what ive seen a good majority of tanks run at.

7 alk for ulns
8-9 lns
11 for 5-10 no3 / .02po4
up to 16 dkh for 20 no3 / .2 po4

also. the test done on the barrier reef was done by tossing bags of fertilizer in a section of the reef daily. those corals get far less than 200 par and lack the power to utilize all those nutrients.

my examples are off controlled environments. you should look at more than what randy states. he has no peer reviewed white papers on the matter and has stated some untrue things in our disagreements. like water not being homegenous or foam fractionation dependent on water height.

citing his writeups, (while usually correct) comes up with some flawed conclusions that the science does not agree with.

white tips are due to calcification accelerated beyond symbiodinium growth. increasing this density forgoes the "white" tips.

this is why hobbyist call it "alk burn". not "po4 burn".

btw. i am participating in a grow-off with my po4 dosed up to .15 ppm daily. i have no skimmer.
 
I haven't read all the articles, but from your discussion.... If high nitrates is a problem, we can combat it with higher PAR or an increase in ALK?
 
JBDreefs;1069576 wrote: I haven't read all the articles, but from your discussion.... If high nitrates is a problem, we can combat it with higher PAR or an increase in ALK?

define "problem"?
is it a magic number you are going for, or is there a legit issue with your tank?

what is your po4 and do you use gfo?
 
Back
Top