jmaneyapanda;541368 wrote: I would agree and disagree with some of your statements. I agree wholeheartedly that I have seen some store owner do what equates to torture in order to get a clam to release (and sell) a clam, including pulling, twisting, and chiseling (jeez). However, using a razor is a perfectly acceptable way to remove them, provided the cut is made as far from the foot as possible. The byssal threads are an inconsequential part of the anatomy, and can be cut with no damage to the clam. The foot, or byssus (byssal gland) secretes the byssal threads which secure the clam. This is what is left behind when a clam "jumps" after it was attached. If the byssus itslef is damaged, that can be fatal. But the threads can be cut with not ill effect.
I agree that a clam shouldnt be epoxied, but I believe it was suggested to make a cradle of the epoxy for the clam to lay in.
As for clams in the sand, while I do agree they "can" live there, I would argue that the majority of clams would MUCH prefer to live on the rocks of the reef. Only the largest clams in adult gigas and derasas lack byssal involvement as adults. They use their own weight to sit in the sandy lagoons. However, juveniles of these species, and adults and juveniles of the other species are always found in the reef rocks, with byssal threads to secure them. While they may live in the sand, I would argue they are MUCH happier and more adept to living int the rocks, under suitable conditions.