Finally managed to get one of my 10,000K 50W LEDs wired up, and captured its spectrum.
Here's a comparison between the 10,000K and 20,000K:
http://spectralworkbench.org/sets/show/10">http://spectralworkbench.org/sets/show/10</a>
20,000K:
[IMG]http://spectralworkbench.org/spectra/show/145">http://spectralworkbench.org/spectra/show/145</a>
10,000K:
[IMG]http://spectralworkbench.org/spectra/show/155">http://spectralworkbench.org/spectra/show/155</a>
The 20,000K LED appears to have more sharp peaks compared to the 10,000K.
As a result, I think the 10,000K has a smoother gradient between the blue/green/red color bands and appears "more white" to the eye.
Also - the respective heights of each line aren't that important, they're more a result of not being able to capture the light from a repeatable distance every time - therefore the lines are higher/lower depending on the capture.
What is more important is the horizontal position of the peaks, and the relative height of the peaks/valleys of the graph.
/NERD
Here's a comparison between the 10,000K and 20,000K:
http://spectralworkbench.org/sets/show/10">http://spectralworkbench.org/sets/show/10</a>
20,000K:
[IMG]http://spectralworkbench.org/spectra/show/145">http://spectralworkbench.org/spectra/show/145</a>
10,000K:
[IMG]http://spectralworkbench.org/spectra/show/155">http://spectralworkbench.org/spectra/show/155</a>
The 20,000K LED appears to have more sharp peaks compared to the 10,000K.
As a result, I think the 10,000K has a smoother gradient between the blue/green/red color bands and appears "more white" to the eye.
Also - the respective heights of each line aren't that important, they're more a result of not being able to capture the light from a repeatable distance every time - therefore the lines are higher/lower depending on the capture.
What is more important is the horizontal position of the peaks, and the relative height of the peaks/valleys of the graph.
/NERD