Dosing vs Calcium Reactor

[gort]

Thats interesting. I see TLF have a pretty cheap KW reactor/stirrer .. thing. What do you think of using that?? Could you explain a little more what you mean?

I am just now starting to think i need this. And hook it to my ATO??

thanks in advance

SnowManSnow;790375 wrote: if youre just starting sps you'll b fine with a kalk stirrer for a long while.

b

 

[gort]

Thats interesting. I see TLF have a pretty cheap KW reactor/stirrer .. thing. What do you think of using that?? Could you explain a little more what you mean?

I am just now starting to think i need this. And hook it to my ATO??

thanks in advance

 

[schwaggs]

Anything over 90, I would go CA reactor, no brainier on a SPS 180 IMO. I had a very hard time balancing CA and Alk when using 2 part. I could get one or the other in range but not both at the same time. You can't beat a properly implemented CA reactor in my opinion. With the right media, your CA, Alk and Mg will stay balanced.