rdnelson99;822261 wrote: Sorry Charles but that is not the case. If only on receptacle is on a circuit it must be rated equal to or greater than the rating of the circuit. No exception. If you put a 15 amp receptacle on a dedicated 20 amp circuit you could draw 20 amps without tripping the breaker thereby overloading the receptacle putting you at risk of fire. #12 gauge is now and always has been #12 gauge. If it were anything less it would not be #12 gauge.
<span style="color: Blue">well... maybe the hole on the strippers just got bigger. LOL as with anything they have downsized stuff over the years. a 16p nail now is no where the same size as before. they even took the extra paper from the double mint gum. </span>
<span style="color: blue">your correct it should be recp and wire with and undersized breaker not a smaller receptical. this was the begining of the gfic era and the recepticals were not out yet so you had to use a gfic breaker. this meant all of the stuff that needed it was daisy chained through the house</span>
Some of the things you did when wiring those homes were not required by code. They were not against it but also not required.
What all of that means is that in a home, I could almost put all lighting and receptacles on on circuit with a few exceptions. The home owner would not like it much but by code it would be fine.
<span style="color: blue">it's very frustrating to have 1 and a 1/2 rooms on a breaker we never had any heating issues due to having everything over sized. that's why i said high end. not the normal or going overboard. i have worked on houses that all of the panels and rooms were overloaded and maxed out. with no more room to add something. even a sub panel as the main was undersized to handle the extra load</span>