- Messages
- 5,121
- Reaction score
- 7
How did we logically determine that SPS corals need more flow than lps? I understand that they are located on reefs with crashing waves etc. but they are also in low flow areas comparatively speaking.
No argument there I have experienced the same. I understand that the photosynthesis and respiration rates are affected by higher flow but would not lps be affected the same way as long as polyps would stay extended?EnderG60;606675 wrote: next time your at my place have a close look at where the flow is in my tank. SPS in high flow are growing at 2-5x the speed of the ones is low/no flow.
grouper therapy;606680 wrote: No argument there I have experienced the same. I understand that the photosynthesis and respiration rates are affected by higher flow but would not lps be affected the same way as long as polyps would stay extended?
Which raises another question for me and (please forgive me I don't know the hydrodynamic terms) what is more flow? Is it faster water or more water volume?stacy22;606690 wrote: I think a couple of things may factor here. Most SPS are found on reef crest areas, like you mentioned. These areas, of course, have a tremendous amount of flow. LPS, in comparison, are typically more lagoonal type organisms who are adapted to much lower rates of flow (and less pristine water).
LPS polyps are more prone to injury than those of sps. I will have to look up a valid source for this.
These are just generalizations. I am certain that some SPS can do well in lower flow and some LPS fare well in higher flow.
Interesting.EnderG60;606692 wrote: Im not exactly sure, but I think it has to do with harm causing growth. Plating monti seems to plate more in current to protect itself. As well as most SPS tend to grow faster after being fragged/broken. Similarly SPS tend to grow thicker branches when in high current.
Seems to be similar to how bones become denser and muscles grow larger with abuse.
I would guess LPS and softies do not respond the same way because the tissues can more easily be blown off. Something to do with evolution to suit your environment. More fleshy tissue for low current and high food grabbability, or less tissue and more skeliton for high flow punishment.
EnderG60;606692 wrote: ...... Something to do with evolution to suit your environment. More fleshy tissue for low current and high food grabbability, or less tissue and more skeliton for high flow punishment.
grouper therapy;606955 wrote: So what type of flow do you guys think is more beneficial. Intermittent high velocity or steady slower high volume?
I have pondered that idea as well. Then I started researching a reverse Carlson surge deviceTChristman;607054 wrote: Have you thought about setting up a surge system for your all in one?