Looking for any recent experience with either of the checkers above - i do like my alk, phos ulr and nitrate checkers to preface but use red sea for the other 2 params.
I recall seeing something recently about the new Mag testers being decent so was really leaning this way as I'm having issues feeling dialed in with the Red Sea titration. Especially when .02ml is like a 40 ppt swing.
The Red Sea calcium works ok for me and the margin of error is a bit better to me, but I do like the idea of a digital readout.
Above all else, given testing correctly etc., can they at least be said to be accurate/not a giant pain to use?
I recall seeing something recently about the new Mag testers being decent so was really leaning this way as I'm having issues feeling dialed in with the Red Sea titration. Especially when .02ml is like a 40 ppt swing.
The Red Sea calcium works ok for me and the margin of error is a bit better to me, but I do like the idea of a digital readout.
Above all else, given testing correctly etc., can they at least be said to be accurate/not a giant pain to use?