Maybe this will help.
anit77;1059215 wrote: We're only talking a few inches over the top of the siphon. This has no real effect in increasing the amount of flow. It's gravity's effect on the water in the pipe that does that. In a vertical drop the longer the pipe the more water is on that pipe. More water = more weight = more flow.
Yes that is somewhat correct. But when your restricting flow with the valve if the bottom of the siphon pipe isn't submerged you're giving the opportunity for air to enter the pipe as the flow is reduced there to the point that air pressure is more than the water pressure. This is hard to explain in text typing on my phone. It's the same principle as the class room experiment with a glass of water and a piece of paper and turning it upside down. It's the air pressure and vacuum that keeps the water in the glass.
No I'm not . The results of my test mentioned above clearly shows there is a difference albeit not large. Head pressure is the same against a pump impeller or that valve. The head pressure increases with depth or height not surface area or weight. That is why a larger pipe does not make a difference in head lose above an impeller. It will actually increase the flow.anit77;1059322 wrote: You're confusing head pressure for pumps and water weight over an open pipe. Water only weighs 0.036127lbs per cubic inch. So if you have 5" over the top of the siphon pipe there's 2.89 ounces of weight over the entrance of the pipe. If you double the height you still don't even have a quarter pound of pressure. Granted this is a generalization you can see we're not talking much in the over flow box.
anit77;1059327 wrote: Maybe this will help.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siphon">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siphon</a>[/QUOTE]
Not really but thanks. Actually we are not using the term siphon correctly since there is no lift.. This is a typical drain that we restrict until flooded. I do agree that gravity powers it.
Noise wise from basically nothing to like a faucet running. I guess it would depend on the gph as far as noise in or out. Submerged was almost silent.squarebob;1060025 wrote: So what was the difference in noise between having the outlet submerged or open? I have my Bean submerged about 3/4" and it is noise free. It take about a minute to clear after the return pump is restarted.
Which end? We are referencing the discharge end which does not have to be submerged. Technically if there is no lift of water I don't think it is a siphon.SnowManSnow;1060037 wrote: If they aren't submerged you wouldn't get a syphon. That's what makes it so quiet... It isn't a drain .... It's a syphon where the overflows are completely filled with water
So long, and thanks for all the fish.
hzheng33;1059205 wrote: for whatever it's worth, this was shares with me from Grant. For clarification, we are talking about the 1/2 inch difference between the water level and the wiers, correct?
alt="" />
grouper therapy;1059284 wrote: Ok guys after several trials with each scenario here are the results
3/4" bulkhead 3/4" thin wall pvc and 3/4" true union ball valve 84" to the top of the waterline in the tank. 72" to the opening in the bulkhead.
time to fill 5 gallon bucket
discharge under water 59,57,61 seconds
discharge out of water 57,56,59 seconds
no pipe after true union valve 58 ,59,60 seconds
Now with a 6" standpipe in bulkhead reducing the distance to the waterline by 50%
e.
discharge under water 68,70,75 seconds
discharge out of water 69,71,74 seconds.
So I deduct the only difference was the taller standpipe in the overflow,which reduced flow around 10-15%
I would like to see how much 18" difference would be.
The discharge under water or out made no difference
Also the difference in height after valve seemed to have very little impact either.