- Messages
- 847
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey Matt what is that second picture?
I call it "no name red and teal chalice that ralph wants."merkywater;580521 wrote: Hey Matt what is that second picture?
Touché.:lol2:mysterybox;580528 wrote: hehehe
Coming from a family that has horses, chalices are WAY cheaper!!!!Appaloosa1224;580543 wrote: I'd rather have a horse
Sure, they look nice, but are way way way overpriced.
OK, the horse itself may be cheaper, but what about boarding/feeding/maintaining. Not ever close....JUST SAYIN'.Appaloosa1224;580575 wrote: Coming from a person who has been competitively involved in horses most her life, some of those chalices are more expensive than a decent trail horse. Just sayin'.
JAustin;580492 wrote:
Chalices aren't for everyone, just like black counter tops or herpes.
SuperClown;580565 wrote:
sexycorals.com
Landon;580641 wrote: Wow! Who wants to give me a gift card to sexycorals.com :thumbs:
JAustin;580490 wrote: A tiny frag of this chalice from Rit was a good deal compared to what i've seen out there but a couple hundred bucks is fine by me because when this bad boy grows out it's gonna turn heads!
brianjfinn;580653 wrote: I'd say this thread is akin to the Ford vs. Chevy debate. My opinion is that there are very boring and drab chalices, as well as acros, and every other type of coral. But, there are also some very striking pieces, as well. Red Planet acro, for one, is one of my favorite, while the tricolor acros don't really do it for me. I really love the chalices with a lot of color contrast, but definitely can't justify paying a couple hundred bucks for a single eye.
Next thing you know, we'll have people with bumper stickers of Calvin peeing on an acro colony.![]()