I'm bringing up this topic becasue I've had time now to build and live with both types of reef systems for a decent time now.
I kept a reef back in the mid 1990s when it was a bit more difficult than now because there weren't the advances in understanding and equipment that we see today. I left the reef hobby in 1998 and got into high tech freshwater planted tanks because I got tired of the work, expense, and uncertainty of success involved with keeping a reef then. Planted tanks had some of the same appeal, equipment and water chemistry wise, that reefkeeping had, but were a lot easier and less expensive to get into, and a lot more forgiving of less than perfect conditions.
I see a similar, but not as disparate, parallel to an LPS/Softy reef vs an SPS reef. My 60 cube and 100 gallon chalice tanks are LPS reefs, and my 210 is an SPS reef.
I spend at least 5 times more time worrying and fretting about the SPS corals I have vs my chalices and acans. It seems to me that the work vs enjoyment ratio is less for SPS than it is for LPS and softies.
It just seems that there are a LOT more things that can go wrong with SPS corals than there are for LPS and softies. I find myself being able to WATCH and ENJOY my 60 and 100 gallon tank, whereas many times I find myself critically looking at the SPS corals in my 210 and scanning for redbugs, AEFWS, placement issues, is the chemistry right, and worrying more than enjoying.
I love SPS corals, but sometimes I don't know if the worry and work are worth it?
Dave
I kept a reef back in the mid 1990s when it was a bit more difficult than now because there weren't the advances in understanding and equipment that we see today. I left the reef hobby in 1998 and got into high tech freshwater planted tanks because I got tired of the work, expense, and uncertainty of success involved with keeping a reef then. Planted tanks had some of the same appeal, equipment and water chemistry wise, that reefkeeping had, but were a lot easier and less expensive to get into, and a lot more forgiving of less than perfect conditions.
I see a similar, but not as disparate, parallel to an LPS/Softy reef vs an SPS reef. My 60 cube and 100 gallon chalice tanks are LPS reefs, and my 210 is an SPS reef.
I spend at least 5 times more time worrying and fretting about the SPS corals I have vs my chalices and acans. It seems to me that the work vs enjoyment ratio is less for SPS than it is for LPS and softies.
It just seems that there are a LOT more things that can go wrong with SPS corals than there are for LPS and softies. I find myself being able to WATCH and ENJOY my 60 and 100 gallon tank, whereas many times I find myself critically looking at the SPS corals in my 210 and scanning for redbugs, AEFWS, placement issues, is the chemistry right, and worrying more than enjoying.
I love SPS corals, but sometimes I don't know if the worry and work are worth it?
Dave