Cameron;121138 wrote: More pressure should relate to more water being forced down the line. You would think a maxijet which kicks out over 100-200gph would be far more pressure on the system than 3.2gph. I don't know what the max flow through RO/DI tubing is, but I have to imagine it is well more than 3.2gph hour.
Yes and no: You are right in that as long as the tubing can handle the flow, the back pressure should be low (though you need to add any "head" pressure, if you pump it very far vertically.. a problem when I was pumping from the basement to my tank). Where you really run into problems is when the tubing gets clogged up. That can happen on Kalk systems, especially where it exits the tubing. I blew the tube out of the end of a dosing pump when it got clogged like this once.
The Maxijet only pumps that much if it is unrestricted. It is not a pressure-type of pump. The less flow it has, the less efficient it will be. Centrifugal pumps depend a lot on velocity.
The 3.2 GPH has whatever your inlet pressure is behind it. In my case, that is 60psi. The RO membrane and flow restrictor in front of it is limiting the flow, but if you plug the output, it will equalize out to that pressure, or close too it (or as much as the membrane can take, since the waste water output line will still be low). That is why the float-valve kits for RO units are designed to cutoff the inlet water flow when the outlet backs up.
Again, the problem mostly only comes up when something restricts the tube on the output. Unfortunately, it only takes once to do some serious damage, depending on what "gives". By using a "pull" system, versus a "push" system, the vacuum can only result in so much of a pressure gradient, and one that pulls things together versus blowing them apart.
By the way, I am speaking from experience here. I won't give the details:unsure:
-Mike