ichthyoid;728899 wrote: Ahhh, so you carbon dose! That's a game changer my friend. I assume that you have a big skimmer on this tank of yours as well?
I actually agree with everything you said, except the role that the plenum allegedly contributes.
I, and many others, have great success dosing carbon without plenums. So, what does that say about the plenums 'critical' role?
It tells me it is unnecessary/provides no benefit.
The prevailing premise is that the carbon supplementation reduces or eliminates the carbon limitation on bacterial growth in the water column. Those bacteria now grow prolifically and bind up excess nutrients, including nitrate and phosphate, before they are able to diffuse into substrates, and be incorporated by bacteria there.
Bacterial export (via protein skimming) is energetically favored, therefore dominates.
Nutrient diffusion into substrates is not favored, being dependent on pore size, diffusion gradient and depth.
FWIW-
I grew up in central Florida, in the heart of the phosphate belt, and saw the results first hand. Millions of years of this action left phosphate rich deposits several meters thick in limestone bedrock. My Dad worked in the industry for years.
I have been around a while, a little before the invention of dirt. :yes:
Now for the reference-
http://www.eas.gatech.edu/files/Ingall_NewsViews2010.pdf">http://www.eas.gatech.edu/files/Ingall_NewsViews2010.pdf</a>
At some concentration the dynamics will shift from, deposition of phosphorous into the substrate mediated by bacteria, to release back into the tanks water column. That is what I believed happened in my tank.[/QUOTE]
Thanks for the link. Interesting. I keep my magnesium rather high........1400-1500....not necessarily on purpose, but it just tends to stay there dosing the TM Bio Calcium that I've determined to be added to keep the Ca between 425-450. I haven't had to dose the Bio Magnesium in quite some time. I say that because I feel that the higher Mg level limits the formation of the CaPO4. I can only attribute the phosphorus level being so low to the macroalgae. And, by nutrients....I assumed you found something that included more that just phosphorus.......but that is certainly something to consider because it does leach into any CaCO3 items. And, of course back out when that same CaCO3 is broken down. Of course, the plenum is not integral, but it helped with the NO3 level even before I had the skimmer and dosing regimen I have now. It falls into the "has helped", can't hurt category for me.....and is why I use them still. It costs next to nothing and properly maintained, has helped me personally. It is cheaper and more aesthetically pleasing to me than a DSB. I do also have a BK 200 skimmer which does help.
Edit: [QUOTE=][B]UmbrellaCorp;728951 wrote:[/B] went two days w/o a change and it stayed at 15. Did a change yesterday, will see this morning if i got it down any lower. I think it has about stabled out... *knock on wood* Ill keep you all updated. Thanks again for the help and suggestions![/QUOTE]
Glad to hear that you are coming down. Sorry the thread got hijacked from my plenum suggestion. You can decide for yourself if it is something worth looking into.
But, I would strongly recommend that if you are gonna do water changes to help correct nutrients, you really need to look into doing water changes that are more like 50%. So, long as you mix the water in a separate tub for a day and nearly match salinity, and temperature.....you should be fine. It certainly cannot hurt to do even a 100% Water change in this regard as opposed to allowing nitrates to linger are very high levels. It may not be advisable on a stable system, but I would find it hard to believe that your corals would be hardy enough to survive troublesome nutrient levels, but not hardy enough to withstand a 50% water change. I have even performed 75% water changes on a tank with bleaching SPS and nitrates in the 40s. The corals rebounded nicely.......to my surprise. Disclaimer......wasn't a tank of mine, but an acquaintance in Okinawa. I never have nutrient issues because I use a plenum and refugium. :yes: