- Messages
- 4,973
- Reaction score
- 389
? who??
are they an acceptable source of carbon dosing?
thoughts?
B
are they an acceptable source of carbon dosing?
thoughts?
B
jhutto;667957 wrote: I just took my biopellets off line. I worked at it since December with break outs of hair algae and cyano and my sps not looking so hot. I dosed zeobak, mb7, water changes and just could not get nitrates below 20. I read extensively on rc central and it appears that there are some successes but lots of those with tank crashes, etc.
Today I added a refugium and will go that way for a while.
Rbredding;667992 wrote: I use them in the powerbuy reactor that I got a couple months ago...
I ran out of nitrate test kits, so I haven't had a chance to see where they are.. (but the tank is growing like crazy)
SnowManSnow;668004 wrote: Previous to running the biopellets... were you dosing any bacteria? Do you now? Or do you just run the pellets?
I have a BRS single media reactor.. .would that work ?
B
Smallblock;668027 wrote: Brs makes a different cylinder to put in the reactor, I just got one today. It looks a little different and you dont use the sponges.
gregoryleonard;668023 wrote: I have been using Marine Bio Pearls from the UK for 4 months now in areactor.
I decided to go that route instead on pellets after all the research I did for a month. My nitrates were 20+ before starting and are undetectable now for the last month using red sea pro low level test kit. After I got nitrates to undetectable level, I added Rowaphos in a reactor to bring my phosphates to undetectable from .25.
No HA, no cyano, no reduction in ph like you can get with pellets.
I have had good success with the pearls, took it slow and am happy with the results. Skimmer went nuts and is still pulling dark green to brown gunk out of my water column. Coraline algae went nuts too.
Smallblock;668027 wrote: Brs makes a different cylinder to put in the reactor, I just got one today. It looks a little different and you dont use the sponges.
SnowManSnow;668095 wrote: I have read in several places to put the OUTPUT FROM THE BIO reactor close to the INPUT OF THE SKIMMER? Is this true? ...
If so.. then I'm understanding that the "doing" takes places inside the reactor... then outputs...
Just trying to figure why to suck the water back into the skimmer to have things removed that the bio pellets put INTO the system..
I'm sure somethin is wrong with my logic here..
someone help me out