Hnguyen;902405 wrote: As I said before, everyone has their own opinion and their own ways of going about in this hobby. <span style="color: royalblue">There is a huge difference between "opinion" versus "empirical scientific evidence". </span>
Just because "established marine science" doesn't back it up, doesn't mean it can't be true. <span style="color: royalblue">This is true. BUT why would someone who has the best interest in livestock in mind want to avoid using a know, proven procedure in favor of something that someone says works simply because it appeared to for him? </span>
Science doesn't back up my religion, so does that mean I should stop wasting my time and stop going to Sunday mass? I think not. <span style="color: royalblue">Science is based on facts and knowledge and religion is based on belief and faith. Science has no goal of backing any religion. The two constructs are not comparable here. </span>
Did you perform these test and studies yourself or was it something you just read? <span style="color: royalblue">I have not. I have also not performed my own research studies related to the theory of relativity or atomic structure. That does not mean that I cannot or should not accept these. I make a conscious choice to read and understand scientific research that has been carried out with rigorous controls. I teach microbiology so I have read many peer-reviewed scientific articles about the life cycle, ecology, and erradication of Cryptocaryon</em>. </span>
I'll leave this thread with this last post and a quote.
"I read it on the internet, you can't post anything on the internet that isn't true".
