Skriz;421120 wrote: Fans- I am working on a system that will blow massive amounts of air into my sump and vent it outside of the house. This should give me some really good cooling for very little expense. Should being the operative word.
Chiller-I am installing the chiller outside this time. This will keep the heat the chiller produces outside. I'm hoping it will never turn on.
Actinics- I removed my vho's a while back. I've been using pc's for dusk to dawn (4x65 watts), but may change it to only 2x64 to shave off a little more power.
Closed loop- Since I've had to use so many tunzes, I'm going to be more efficient with a CL ran by a Reeflo Dart that'll only pull about 120 watts. I may look into shutting this down at night via the controller and have a tunze providing some flow at night.
Powersave: http://www.power-save.com/1200.html">http://www.power-save.com/1200.html</a>
I've been considering this product for years, but I've never pulled the trigger. It doesn't really make sense to me and haven't found anyone who can vouch for it either. I would love for this thing to work at a rate of even 10% as that alone will pay for itself in one year.[/QUOTE]
While I'm not ready to "vouch" for this product, sight unseen, I can tell you that 'in principle' it could work. How do I know? The power companies fight this battle every day. There are engineers working constantly to 'balance the load and power factor'. Why is there a problem? There are several types of electrical devices:
1) purely resistive loads, like light bulbs.
2) capacitive loads, which act like shorts (like an empty battery)
3) inductive loads, which resist any change in current (motors)
These three are called 'linear' loads.
4) 'noisy' devices, like rectifiers and arc discharge devices (flourescent lights, arc welders, etc.)
These are non-linear devices.
If there were the same number of 2's and 3's, and also no 4's, there would be no problem. The fact is the numbers of the above types of devices varies from place to place and by time of day. The result is that the pretty 60 cycle per second sine wave power from the power plant gets trashed by these imbalances and looks nothing like a sine wave (real noisy and distorted). That makes it less efficient. Your device is a cost effective way to 'clean up' the sine wave and restore that efficiency (and the pure waveform). I'm willing to bet $300 that it works. I'm thinking of ordering one, but first I'm gonna check if there is another similar device (competition). Thanks! This one suggestion made my $30 investment in ARC worthwhile. I didn't know they had these for homeowners!