Just to help avoid confusion:
Ripped Tide;679267 wrote: I changed the micron and the carbon cartridge of my RO unit…
Sediment filters and carbon blocks have very small holes in them. So small that the diameter of the holes are measured in millionths of a meter, or “microns.” Best to refer to prefilters as “sediment filters” and “carbon blocks.” Really no such thing as a “micron filter.”
After back flushing and putting everything back together…
I don’t know of any systems that “back” flush – meaning reverse the normal direction of water flow. Some systems, include a valve to flush the membrane – but there is no “back” about it.
It is only a 25gpd so rejection should be low.
“Rejection” is a measure of the percent of the contaminants in the feedwater that the RO membrane does NOT allow to pass through to the purified water stream. So your 25 gpd membrane likely has a very high rejection rate – likely 98%. The higher the rejection rate of your membrane, the less work your DI resin has to do to lower the TDS down to 0 ppm.
Rejection can be calculated like this:
100% - (RO water TDS – Feedwater TDS). So if your tap water is 400 ppm TDS, and your RO water is 4 ppm TDS, then
100% - (4/400)=
100% - 1%=
99%
You’ll need a TDS meter to get the data to calculate your membranes rejection rate.
“Rejection rate” has nothing to do with the ratio of purified water to waste water. That’s referred to as “recovery.” Recovery can be calculated by determining the percentage of feedwater that ends up as RO water (a.k.a “permeate”

. So if you have a 4:1 ratio of waste water to permeate, you have a 1/5 or 20% recovery. High recovery may lead to a premature demise of your membrane, and low recovery may needlessly waste water.
Russ