Ringo®;977424 wrote: I mean teeing off the return plumbing to run the reactors. No need for additional pumps.
Bassett22;977419 wrote: What do you see as a benefit of running water faster through carbon?
Carbon, or GAC (granular activated carbon), removes organics. GFO, Granular Ferric Oxide, removes phosphates. They are two entirely different media and do entirely different things. It is not an "either or" type situation. If you want what carbon does, use it. If you want to remove phosphates, use GFO.JC_k;977542 wrote: Not trying to hi-jack the thread but what's the difference between GFO and carbon? All I know is one removes phosphates and one "clarifies" the water? Is it nessicary to run both?
100%hydrophylic;977530 wrote: I have two phosban reactor 150 that i got second hand. I use one for GFO and one for GAC. The GAC one runs at about twice the flow rate as the GFO, and i like how it is working so far. They have been only running a short time, but they seem to be working pretty well.
I would definitely suggest having a way to manage the water flows separately.
Yes, but there are many ways to remove organics, and most reefers use more than one method. It all depends on what corals you keep, what your goals are, and how much work you are willing to do.JC_k;977554 wrote: Wait so if I don't have phosphates then I probabably don't need to run GFO? And don't skimmers remove organics from the water...?
FF337;977623 wrote: Hey Dave, Which reactors are you using?