- Messages
- 1,712
- Reaction score
- 0
A glorious death IMO, But I do feel ya on the cruelty deal but, Amici is right that thing had a hankerin for a spankerin
Thanh386;637675 wrote: Darn... My money was on the hermit.
jmaneyapanda;637747 wrote: The questions isnt the morality of what occurs. Yes, mantis' do eat crustaceans. Its that the filmer does so for amusement. The "joy" is watching one animal kill another is rather disturbing. The whole "contender" and "champion" thing exemplifies it. That mindset is foul.
This whole topic reminded me of this idiot.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BV9z5e1r2KM&feature=player_embedded#at=12">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BV9z5e1r2KM&feature=player_embedded#at=12</a>[/QUOTE]
I suppose I should have watched the video. :) I was just asking about the arguments below the opening post as to the fairness of feeding animals to other animals and not in direct relation to the video.
Rbredding;637773 wrote: ok...
so now that it's out there...
I dont think i'd believe anyone in this hobby that tells me he/she doesn't find it fascinating when fish/inverts/etc compete for food at feeding time...
How many times have you seen a post with this phrase "feeding frenzy"
How can someone separate the action</em> of putting a hermit crab in with a mantis shrimp from the excitement of watching the battle that is caused</em> by someone putting a hermit crab in with a mantis shrimp...
that's like a husband buying a pistol for his wife for self defense, then condemning her when she uses it to save her life..
slayers911;637784 wrote: Comparing puppies to a lion to this video is like apples and oranges. Comparing crocodiles to a lion and this video would be closer.
when the discovery channel shows lions, tigers and gazelles (oh my) at the watering hole and a croc gets them is it for entertainment, for education or for entertainment disguised as education?
Some people like those shows some don't and before you say it, yes I realize nature put those creatures in that spot at the watering hole not man, well theoretically man had nothing to do with it.
with that said I have no problem with this video but like Jeremy said would have a problem with dog fights or "feeding puppies to lions" hypocrisy? Probably, but we all have our limits and things we like and don't like and we all have our hypocrisies...
Interesting thread.
Hmmm that kind of sounds like what I said about nature blah blah blah, oh wait it is what I said...jmaneyapanda;637786 wrote: hThe crocodiles at the watering hole is not an artificial interaction forced in a captive setting by man. .
slayers911;637795 wrote: Hmmm that kind of sounds like what I said about nature blah blah blah, oh wait it is what I said...
You didn't say wild dogs you said puppies. The video had 2 bully crustaceans one on one, you are comparing that to a fierce predator going up against a nearly helpless animal, heck you should have just said feeding babies to lions...
So what is the difference between feeding the zebra to the lion and feeding fish to the bears?? A number of zoo's do that and people flock to see it...
In your opinion it is horrible in a number of others it is not. That is the great thing about opinions everyone has one and to each their own. Oh and if the Atlanta zoo announced they were going to start having live feedings of the lions, I would go and so would a number of other people. Captivity or not it is still nature, unlike feeding penguins to polar bears, that's just wrong.
jmaneyapanda;637821 wrote: I agree- opinionated, but there is still a line in the sand. Some teenage girl in Yugoslavia (or something) posted a video of her throwing puppies in the river and laughing at them drowning. She has had nothing happen to her, but she has been decried as a villian. Not a problem, til you post some videos where youre mocking and marginalizing what it is. Then, its immediately innappropriate.
I like debating too. Its a discussion, and we will part having respect.
Now, WHAT penguin polar bear refernce?! I didnt see it!