I think plumbing is more descriptive and actually more accurate. Hydronamics in an aquarium relate more to flow in the main aquarium and I don't think anyone is really that interested in the math behind the flow. I would actually be interested in tips and techniques for better plumbing in the aquarium. I can glue pipes together pretty well and I know a couple things that most don't, but I bet there is a lot I don't actually know.Actually, that should be Hydrodynamics 101. </em>Plumbing is the easy part, understanding how and why water behaves in various conditions/applications is really the key, plumbing would be more like Applied Hydrodynamics</em>.
If I understood properly, he got a 4' tank (90 gallons I think) running full flow with 4 maxijets by simply alternating them in the proper sequence. He bascially "rocked" the tank like you would a baby and got great flow from small pumps.What's Jakes effects?
Cameron;39717 wrote: ... a simple course on electrical wiring including some info on safety
Why would a person talking about electricity and safety be a liability issue? Even if there were a demonstration on say building your own float switch or wiring a ballast, I don't think there would be any issue much less a HUGE LIABILITY issue. I have been to numerous car audio conferences and nobody has every had a problem with demoing wiring of amps, speakers and such. The last conference I went to actually showed how to do a DIY amp. The fragging demo we had in February was more dangerous than basic wiring 101.KRB;40081 wrote: HUGE LIABILITY ISSUE
Cameron;40068 wrote: I think plumbing is more descriptive and actually more accurate. Hydronamics in an aquarium relate more to flow in the main aquarium and I don't think anyone is really that interested in the math behind the flow. I would actually be interested in tips and techniques for better plumbing in the aquarium. I can glue pipes together pretty well and I know a couple things that most don't, but I bet there is a lot I don't actually know.
washowi;40114 wrote: How the speakers guys? Who do you want to see?
I agree those are all good topics to discuss.siege;40135 wrote: My reference to hydrodynamics was less about the water movement in the tank, and more in the vein of plumbing, in that water doesn't always do how people think it might, and plumbing can really effect that flow. An example is how we prevented our sump return and overflows from siphoning all the water out of our system in case of power loss by drilling a small hole in the return tube just as it enters the fish tank, below the level of the glass and at or just above the waterline. When power is lost, this small hole that squirts just a little water out under normal operation causes the siphon to break by allowing air in to the system, preventing a reverse siphon effect from occurring. The effect is easily enough understood once you see it in action, but the principle isn't quite common sense unless you're a long-time reefer or plumber. We considered, for example, using a ball valve off of the return line under the tank to supply water to the fuge, but my roomie pointed out that not only are these hard to fine-tune for water-flow, but that the pressure on the system might just turn that little opening into a pressure nozzle, and seriously degrade the performance of the sump.
Yes, plumbing in the end is still probably the best term, but I'd be just as interested in the hydrodynamic principles of the plumbing as I am ways to fit pipe parts together and the proper amount of teflon tape to use.
Cameron;40159 wrote: I agree those are all good topics to discuss.
I wouldn't T from the return into the fuge but rather from the drain. More nutrients will flow into the fuge that way.
BTW, I personally point two of my four locline ends above the water line. One to stop the reverse syphon, but also to increase oxygenation of the water. Also, I warn everyone I know to avoid teflon tape under pressure because it will likely fail eventually and often leaks immediately.
I agree that electrical wiring is not difficult by any means. But if you are showing how to wire something up and one of the attendees goes home and tries it, does it incorrectly, and burns down their house, lawsuits are very possible. Miswiring a ballast can be a fire hazard. Car audio is a vastly different beast we're talking 12 volts vs. 120 voltsCameron;40085 wrote: Why would a person talking about electricity and safety be a liability issue? Even if there were a demonstration on say building your own float switch or wiring a ballast, I don't think there would be any issue much less a HUGE LIABILITY issue. I have been to numerous car audio conferences and nobody has every had a problem with demoing wiring of amps, speakers and such. The last conference I went to actually showed how to do a DIY amp. The fragging demo we had in February was more dangerous than basic wiring 101.
It isn't volts that kill you it is amps and that is entirely based on the circuit design. You can get hit by 200,000 volts and walk away from it. If my choice is to eat a 250w ballast or eat 800 watts of car audio amplifier output... I will take the ballast.KRB;40202 wrote: I agree that electrical wiring is not difficult by any means. But if you are showing how to wire something up and one of the attendees goes home and tries it, does it incorrectly, and burns down their house, lawsuits are very possible. Miswiring a ballast can be a fire hazard. Car audio is a vastly different beast we're talking 12 volts vs. 120 volts
I didn't mention anything killing anyone. I was speaking of fire hazards. low voltage systems rarely catch fire. High voltage (over 50 volts) systems do regularly.Cameron;40210 wrote: It isn't volts that kill you it is amps and that is entirely based on the circuit design. You can get hit by 200,000 volts and walk away from it. If my choice is to eat a 250w ballast or eat 800 watts of car audio amplifier output... I will take the ballast.
As for someone showing you how to do something and you going home and screwing it up, you can't sue for that and win. No insurance company is going to take a threat like that into consideration. If so, there wouldn't be fragging demos, construction projects demo'd at places like home depot, snake handling shows, etc. Absolute worst case scenario you could ask people to sign a waiver, but that is WAY overkill. I don't even think you would need a disclaimer in front of the presentation.
In my experience, car fires from faulty wiring are VERY common. I personally have smoked more zero gauge wire from dropping screwdriver at the wrong time than I ever have wiring a home. Voltage has very little to do with fire. Voltage is oft misunderstood.KRB;40239 wrote: I didn't mention anything killing anyone. I was speaking of fire hazards. low voltage systems rarely catch fire. High voltage (over 50 volts) systems do regularly.
I didn't say you couldn't sue. I said you couldn't sue and win. If someone ever did sue and win, nobody would ever show anyone anything DIY. There are websites with photo how tos, books, videos, TV shows etc on doing this stuff and they are no more or less liable as the information is exactly the same only the media is changing. The only reason an insurance company would care is if someone could be injured during a demonstration not somebody sueing for personal injury or loss by trying something at home.KRB;40239 wrote: Sure you could sue for that. Why do think their are disclaimers on shows like jackass and what not. Ask a liability insurance company what the premium difference would be between a show with no electrical demo and one without.
Why would this media be any less liable for showing you how to do something?KRB;40239 wrote: Anyway, it is not that big a deal. if you want to learn to wire something up there are plenty of how to books at home depot. It is not hard.
Two things cause that disclaimer. First, standard boiler plate you see in every movie/TV show credits. Second, it has been argued in court that these shows promote and encourage dangerous and reckless behavoir. Showing someone how to safely wire a ballast does not fall into this category.KRB;40239 wrote: as for jackass
There are disclaimers in all how to books that deal with anything that could potentially cause damage and/or injury. I am sure there are disclaimers on any show that does the same. Any demo that doesn't provide a disclaimer is setting themselves up for a suit.Cameron;40242 wrote: In my experience, car fires from faulty wiring are VERY common. I personally have smoked more zero gauge wire from dropping screwdriver at the wrong time than I ever have wiring a home. Voltage has very little to do with fire. Voltage is oft misunderstood.
I didn't say you couldn't sue. I said you couldn't sue and win. If someone ever did sue and win, nobody would ever show anyone anything DIY. There are websites with photo how tos, books, videos, TV shows etc on doing this stuff and they are no more or less liable as the information is exactly the same only the media is changing. The only reason an insurance company would care is if someone could be injured during a demonstration not somebody sueing for personal injury or loss by trying something at home.
Why would this media be any less liable for showing you how to do something?
Two things cause that disclaimer. First, standard boiler plate you see in every movie/TV show credits. Second, it has been argued in court that these shows promote and encourage dangerous and reckless behavoir. Showing someone how to safely wire a ballast does not fall into this category.
I shot an email to my lawyer to see what she thinks, but I bet she will back me up on this.
I am not against a disclaimer as I said above, but again I don't think someone writing a book or giving a presentation does so in fear of a lawsuit. Time and time again free speech rights alone protect a person from such nonsense.KRB;40252 wrote: There are disclaimers in all how to books that deal with anything that could potentially cause damage and/or injury. I am sure there are disclaimers on any show that does the same. Any demo that doesn't provide a disclaimer is setting themselves up for a suit.
Again situational and has much more to do with design than voltage. A 12V transformer isn't really any more or less of a fire hazard than a 120V transformer. They can both burn a house down or set a car on fire and will usually do so due to some fault in the design or implementation.KRB;40252 wrote: I am an electrician and am well aware of the definition of amps, volts, watts, ohms, etc. I was speaking of types of electrical systems when referring to low or high voltage. As for fire stats, look it up I am fairly sure that high voltage systems produce far more fires than low voltage systems.
Given how many people I have spoken with recently that don't know what a GFCI outlet is or simply don't run one, I think it is just a good idea to educate them on installing one in their home near their tanks. Showing them how to do it isn't a bad idea either. I liken it to cooking. You show people how to cook without going into long disclaimers, waivers etc about the fire being hot.KRB;40252 wrote: Anyway, I am not that concerned with the liability of it. I am not the one paying the GL insurance or organizing the event. Truce?