Never said I was annoyed. It's a large part of my livelihood -- one I chose. Just pointing out that I was not annoyed by the thread.
We were ALL new to the hobby at some point in time.
And as some have pointed out - yes, there are directions on the bottles but since no two tanks are the same, they've given some pointers on how to fine-tune the dosing, and that's valid good advice, and IMO, worthy of discussion.
Could it have been found by searching? Sure. That doesn't mean that OP might not have had more questions. You might also be surprised at the number of people who merely lurk on the forums, and don't post, who might benefit from a current discussion. I encounter these folks all the time - face to face - plenty tell me they read, but don't post. So a thread like this may help many, not just the OP.
Getting flamed doesn't encourage people to learn - it discourages them from asking questions that might need to be asked to avoid problems. That's why this forum exists.
If one doesn't feel like responding - then don't. Leave it to somebody else.
Jenn
Edit:
Ripped Tide;860192 wrote: I don't think the member that put the shark in the cube would have changed his descision, even if he had researched the animal.
Actually, I think he did research the animal, and still made that choice. A week prior to posting that he had a cat shark, he was asking if they could get ick- indicating some research had been done. Some folks just do what they want to do, regardless of advice.
Agreed (discussion was had prior) - however, that individual has remedied the situation and the creature has been relocated. At least, what I saw of that particular thread, while pointed, was respectful (unless it went bad after I stopped reading.)
Jenn