Xyzpdq0121;30188 wrote: You are only increasing the pressure in the PVC at that point. The decrease in PVC size should to restrict the output in the pump much.
Hell in that case run a 9.5 and plump in some pvc at the outlets with holes in it (I forget what the tech name for the physics behind it is) but it will act like a cannon out of each nozzel..
rhomer;30193 wrote: Were talking apples and oranges here. I've been talking about tank turnover and your talking about water velocity. No matter how much you restirct the output of the water your still getting the same gph or less, but you will increase the velocity of the water out of the pipe.
If you want to turn the tank over 20x then need a pump that will do this.
Matt,
With a tank full of anemone's this is a great idea to have a closed loop. this prevents the unfortunate chance of one getting pulled into a Power head, but I don't think you need that much flow for an anemone only tank. The mag 9.5 might be enough.
Rob
rhomer;30193 wrote: Were talking apples and oranges here. I've been talking about tank turnover and your talking about water velocity. No matter how much you restirct the output of the water your still getting the same gph or less, but you will increase the velocity of the water out of the pipe.
If you want to turn the tank over 20x then you need a pump that will do this.
Matt,
With a tank full of anemone's this is a great idea to have a closed loop. this prevents the unfortunate chance of one getting pulled into a Power head, but I don't think you need that much flow for an anemone only tank. The mag 9.5 might be enough.
Rob
MattTVI;30204 wrote: Well...
the poseidin and mag18 are each 140w+... on a 15amp outlet that's already getting close to 10amps used up for the tank alone, I'm trying to avoid pushing it as much as possible, even if it means spending a little more for a more efficient pump.
Was there an argument against getting the Snapper and throttling it back vs. getting a lower rated, but much higher power consumption pump?MattTVI;30204 wrote: Well...
Perhaps I'll go w/ the poseidin... i'm a little leary of using a mag-drive pump externally, even though I know many people have done so... I may go w/ the Mag18 in the end to save some cash... but I'm still thinking along the lines of the squence snapper as it is only 98w in power consumption...
the poseidin and mag18 are each 140w+... on a 15amp outlet that's already getting close to 10amps used up for the tank alone, I'm trying to avoid pushing it as much as possible, even if it means spending a little more for a more efficient pump.
Was there an argument against getting the Snapper and throttling it back vs. getting a lower rated, but much higher power consumption pump?
BTW, according to MDM, throttling the Reef Flo pumps (http://www.reeflopumps.com/"><span style="color: #810081;">http://www.reeflopumps.com/</span></a>) will reduce power consumption and not lessen the life of the pump.[/QUOTE]
I don't know of any reason why you couldn't throttle the snapper back, some sequences have built in control for adjustment. Does the snapper?
Even if it doesn't, I can throttle it back as there will be a ball valve on the loop for when I have to service the pump.
thanks, great post!
Matt
George;30227 wrote: After looking at that calculator on RC, I'm thinking that I might get the Snapper since after the friction loss around the corners and through valves and unions, I'd be right around my target 1800 gph for my 60 gallon cube.
The planning will have to be careful though. 2x2 area doesn't leave much room for lights *and* 1 1/2" pipes.
Why is it a bad idea?MattTVI;30278 wrote: dang it...
looks like it's a bad idea to go over the wall of the tank w/ a sequence pump. anybody doing it?
George;30285 wrote: Why is it a bad idea?
Xyzpdq0121;30290 wrote: NAtt, that is true but in theory the pump will only have to suck for the first turn on, after that a siphon effect should take place to some extent. I do not know much about sequence pumps in this regard though.
George;30295 wrote: Theoretically, unless you're doing a tear-down or major water change, your closed loop should always be flooded. The cohesion of water should pull it up and down. The pump has to be able to do some sucking of water. There's simply no way gravity can feed a pump 3600 gph through a 1 1/2" hole without some force.
The intake just needs to be below the lowest level the water can drop to if the power goes off.
Or, for that matter, how about construct a self-priming container to put in front of it? Or you could buy one http://www.marinedepot.com/md_viewItem.asp?idproduct=DP2919">http://www.marinedepot.com/md_viewItem.asp?idproduct=DP2919</a>
Yes, I like this last idea best of all. :)[/QUOTE]
oh, that is reasuring, what i was thinking was a tee at the top of the CL as it went over the back of the tank w/a threaded cap on it, i could feed that full of water before turning the pump on, then cap it and fire it up.
would that work?
Probably. Basically the same thing without the big basket.MattTVI;30296 wrote: oh, that is reasuring, what i was thinking was a tee at the top of the CL as it went over the back of the tank w/a threaded cap on it, i could feed that full of water before turning the pump on, then cap it and fire it up.
would that work?