McPhock;863480 wrote: No, no, I should have been more clear.
My canister filters all use sintered glass, like this:
http://www.eheim.com/en_GB/products/filter-media/biological/substratpro">http://www.eheim.com/en_GB/products/filter-media/biological/substratpro</a>
Matrix is exact same idea (extremely porous material capable of supporting high bacterial loads), and in fact, even compares itself to Substrat Pro. The extra magic that Denitrate supposedly throws in is that the difference in particle porosity permits anaerobic bacteria to grow that remove nitrate in addition to aerobically removing nitrite and ammonia. The Nitrate portion is where I think they're pulling a bit of marketing magic.
I don't doubt that this product, or any other porous surface can house bacteria that will remove nitrite and ammonia. I'd like to see what the real world results are of using matrix versus another porous biological media in strict nitrate reduction.[/QUOTE]
That product itself seems very akin to matrix/denitrate. However, most "biological" media does not have the porosity of these products. So most biological media only accommodates aerobic bacteria. Very similar to bio balls. Aerobic as all getout, but as a result; "nitrate factories". However, the REAL factor with it is flow. More does not equal better. There needs to be calculated flow to allow for the anaerobic conditions.