Frewl;50100 wrote: Have you looked at the Aqua Medic Turboflotor T1000 Multi.
chrisjet;50129 wrote: ok cameron which skimmer made by octopus could i put outside of my sump, the link says to place thmein the sump
chrisjet;50126 wrote: i think that this would be a good deal , but am not sure about the loudness and i have heard that you have to tinker with the MRC skimmers?
rhomer;50296 wrote: ABSOLUTELY NOT TRUE!!!
Sorry for yelling, but this is exactly the opposite of what I experienced. I took a system where I couldn't get my needlewheel to act consistently, changed to a beckett and I only check it once every week, or once every couple weeks. No tinkering required. I would think that the MR2 would be a good option, in that you could add a second injector and beef up the pump later on during the upgrade and you would have a great setup for that system.
Rob
To some degree, but you can get a good block of chaeto in a small space. You aren't going to have a great DSB with mangroves in a small place but it is still going to help. Course a big skimmer is going to suck far more crap from a system than a small fuge, but that small fuge has more risdual benefits.46bfinga;50365 wrote: Well if your fuge is under 50 gallons,then I would recomend a good skimmer.I mean honestly if your fuge is not large enough to really export nitrates then its not much good in the first place.You will probably fair much better with a better skimmer.Have you noticed a difference since adding the fuge? Everyone Agree?
chrisjet;50321 wrote: Rhomer how loud is your skimmer and does it sit under the tank?
Cameron;50127 wrote: The MR2 is right on the verge of being to small for a 240g. If you go MRC, I wouldn't go less than an MR3 on that size system.
A 360g system is even more than the manufactorer rating. A 6" water column that is 24.5" tall is a relatively small water column for that much tank volume. I am not saying you can't run it on the system, but you would probably pull noticeably more crap out of the system if you ran an MR3. This assumes a medium-heavy bioload in that configuration.mojo;50611 wrote: Actually, I disagree. I think an MR-2 with a PCX-55 and dual becketts is about the most bang you can get for a skimmer. I ran this on my 360g system with no problem (med bioload), and would guess it could handle a full bioload at it's limit. I've used different combinations of pumps and becketts with the MR skimmers (including my current Sequence pump driving it), but this one seems to be optimal.
The beckett skimmers' performance really comes down to what pump you have to push them, IME.
Cameron;50616 wrote: A 360g system is even more than the manufactorer rating. A 6" water column that is 24.5" tall is a relatively small water column for that much tank volume. I am not saying you can't run it on the system, but you would probably pull noticeably more crap out of the system if you ran an MR3. This assumes a medium-heavy bioload in that configuration.
Again not saying the MRC skimmers are poor performers or anything, but these days with all the advancements in the needlewheel design coupled with some really good inexpensive quality skimmers it is hard to not go that route. Beyond the fact that NWs generally use less juice and are quieter.
Which likely brings its cost inline with an MR3 skimmer as well. For a 240g system, an MRC2 will work but an MRC3 would be better.mojo;50618 wrote: My 360 system takes in account 120g of empty sump, so figure my estimates on a 240g tank with medium bioload. I forgot to mention that I also had a 6" riser on it, which effectively made it an MR3 with dual becketts.
I basically said that in a former post...mojo;50618 wrote: Agree on the energy efficiency and quietness - no arguing there. But "advancements" does not mean that the "old" technology fails to operate well; the MR skimmers work as well now as they did 5 years ago.
Cameron wrote: I like MRC skimmers and people who own them generally have a good opinion of them. However, I believe the needlewheel has finally caught and passed beckett technology. ... In the end a properly sized MRC will do the job well as will a properly sized needlewheel so to some degree better is arguable, but a good needlewheels will cost you less over the long haul and will run quieter.