EcoReefGuy;1001951 wrote: Hmm... Thanks. You just made my decision harder lol.
Lol I'm sorry! I wouldn't want to make that decision either.
EcoReefGuy;1001951 wrote: Hmm... Thanks. You just made my decision harder lol.
Bcavalli;1001942 wrote: I would definately go with the Gyre over 1 mp40. Imho
EcoReefGuy;1001951 wrote: Hmm... Thanks. You just made my decision harder lol.
tonymission;1001960 wrote: One of my used vortech controllers stopped working and I just gave them my serial number and they had me a new one in two days no questions asked. That's the only issue I've had with 8 of them in regular use.
SEA Atlanta;999196 wrote: No, it doesnt. Its rather a misnomer. It measures the ability of the water to oxidize. Which is the ability to lose electrons to other compounds. Oxygen can</em> oxidize, but its not mutually exclusive. For aquariums, we use it to measure a quantitive level of anions and cations in water. Or for the typical: "dirt". The lower the OR, the dirtier the water. This is not absolute nor valuable, as other compounds can affect orp. Measuring orp is most (and arguably ONLY) valuble when using ozone.
I think I misunderstood your statement. Stirring the sandbed will likely decrease orp as it release organic trapped in the sandbed into the water column, which would reduce the orp (as does our hands, food, etc). Orp can be affected by a lot, including pH and magnetic and electrical fields, too.
Camellia;1002025 said:Thanks for your input on this product.
Question for you,
My 75 gal DT has a center overflow which I don't like and would never buy again.
IMO it's difficult to get adaquate flow with the center overflow breaking/stopping wave. It demands I use double the equipment that should be required for this size tank.
I've got 2 MP10's (100%) and 2 RW8's running and still can't get desired flow to LPS on the sides (behind overflow) in some areas and high flow to the back, top where SPS are placed.
Do you think this is my solution? Thanks
The gyre will (dependent on location, distance from the surface and orientation of the covers) create a circular flow in your tank. When I feed and leave the pump on, I can watch food particles run across the top the tank down he opposite side and across the top of the sandbed and back up into the bottom of the gyre. The outputs from my return are pointed in the middle of my tank and it creates a lot of turbulence in the center.
However, there are spots in my tank that are lower flow (under the pump) and higher flow (the opposite end of the tank). I could easily add another powerhead to create more flow below the gyre. But, to be honest with it set at 50% that is plenty of flow in my 120DT. I moved some of my coral to the areas that they seem to respond well to. Such as, my open brain loves the high flow on the opposite end while my elegance coral enjoys being under the gyre in that lower flow area.
I started this hobby with a with a 90DT with the center overflow and I know exactly what your talking about. In your case though with a 75 gallon DT it may be too much flow. I suppose you could turn it down to 20 or 30% and use a one of your mp10s to add more turbulence in those areas of concern. But, this powerhead has an unbelievable amount of flow. I posted some pictures earlier in this thread showing the powerful wave action it can create in pulse mode. I do think it may alleviate most of the surface tension issues you have in the opposite corner of the powerhead.
EcoReefGuy;1003385 wrote: I bought 3 mp40 and called it a day.
MvM;1003392 wrote: Enjoy the chorus of them ramping up and down. So annoying. I wish they truly were silent.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
MvM;1003392 wrote: Enjoy the chorus of them ramping up and down. So annoying. I wish they truly were silent.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
EcoReefGuy;1003449 wrote: It's going on a NUVO 40 so I doubt I'll even be close to 50 %. I've always like lower flow from multiple power heads rather than 1 power head blowing at full force.
tonymission;1003457 wrote: You'll probably be sitting around 20% with three of them on there. I'm a serial vortech overuser myself if that wasn't already obvious![]()
Just can't go wrong
I think that is your answer.:yes: Never owned one so I can't speak about the need to run them at the different levels, but every time I have been around them they were very annoying in regards noise. For the kind of money they cost they should be dead silent IMO.tonymission;1003442 wrote: They are virtually silent at 50%... I can't go over that on my frag tanks if I want to keep water in the tank. Not sure why this is always a "thing" in these conversations... I bet most people's overflow plumbing is louder than a vortech.
Nickh06;1003374 wrote: I've had mine going for about 10 days now on a cycling tank and one of the sides stopped spinning today. Real PITA. If I can't run it for more than two weeks without cleaning or changing parts I'm going to return it and get an MP40.
grouper therapy;1003511 wrote: I think that is your answer.:yes: Never owned one so I can't speak about the need to run them at the different levels, but every time I have been around them they were very annoying in regards noise. For the kind of money they cost they should be dead silent IMO.
But in some defense certain freq., tones could possibly be less noticeable to others.
SnowManSnow;1003756 wrote: It is.. IN FACT .. noisy