rjrgroup;940030 wrote: I sit in an office with four walls and I'm almost intelligent...arg...everything is closing in...:aargh4:
leveldrummer;940049 wrote: There is a big difference between keeping a pet, especially dumb fish, then keeping a large intelligent animal that is use to roaming thousands of square miles in a tiny pool.
Im on the fence on this one, but Im certianly leaning strongly to the side that these whales should be left in the ocean. dolphins and other intelligent animals too, is tough to rationalize keeping a few fish from the reef in a tiny box in my living room, but these whales are a different type of animal, and this just isnt right.
mysterybox;940068 wrote: So, I get why people are voting "for", obviously I did, and I already knew this would be a polarizing subject...what I'm not quite understanding is that the reason you should vote no is based almost exclusively on our perceived judgement of the creatures intelligence?
Oh, and I believe my Grandaughter in my photos up there is getting a little more learning and absolute bonding with Ocean creatures than "watching it swim in a circle", lol
Akopley;940117 wrote: Ralph, please explain to me what your granddaughter learned form this experience that she could not have learned from a book, video or experience in the wild? If anything her acquired knowledge of these animals is skewed because they are behaving abnormally in a captive environment.
It's not possible to convince people they are wrong in this situation, because it takes a certain level of ignorance to even consider voting for this. Just the wording of the petition alone is deceptive enough to make many people think this is about sustainability in the wild when in fact it is referring to extinction in a captive environment...which I am not sure qualifies as extinction in the first place.
Akopley;940117 wrote: Ralph, please explain to me what your granddaughter learned form this experience that she could not have learned from a book, video or experience in the wild? If anything her acquired knowledge of these animals is skewed because they are behaving abnormally in a captive environment.
It's not possible to convince people they are wrong in this situation, because it takes a certain level of ignorance to even consider voting for this. Just the wording of the petition alone is deceptive enough to make many people think this is about sustainability in the wild when in fact it is referring to extinction in a captive environment...which I am not sure qualifies as extinction in the first place.
Akopley;940117 wrote: Ralph, please explain to me what your granddaughter learned form this experience that she could not have learned from a book, video or experience in the wild? If anything her acquired knowledge of these animals is skewed because they are behaving abnormally in a captive environment.
It's not possible to convince people they are wrong in this situation, because it takes a certain level of ignorance to even consider voting for this. Just the wording of the petition alone is deceptive enough to make many people think this is about sustainability in the wild when in fact it is referring to extinction in a captive environment...which I am not sure qualifies as extinction in the first place.
mysterybox;940175 wrote: oops, one more....
Penguin encounter...since this is a bird, those people with small square tanks containing animals & dogs without their families should approve of this...lol
Question? are all of you vegetarians?
http://www.georgiaaquarium.org/explore-the-aquarium/events-and-programs/penguin-encounter.aspx?utm_source=EncountersNights_Island&utm_medium=island&utm_content=island_2&utm_campaign=EncountersNights_Island">http://www.georgiaaquarium.org/explore-the-aquarium/events-and-programs/penguin-encounter.aspx?utm_source=EncountersNights_Island&utm_medium=island&utm_content=island_2&utm_campaign=EncountersNights_Island</a>[/QUOTE]
All of your trying to do is justify something by comparing it to totally different situations. It doesn't help your argument much.