seth the wine guy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,356
- Reaction score
- 30
That's SICK! Just SICK! Glad to see someone setting the bar so high. Tank unveiling party at your house?
No skimmer for organic removal I will have a ozone reaction chamber.Oz;587983 wrote: Very Cool D. No skimmer? - using constant water changes? I think you mentioned that before.
LilRobb;587997 wrote: No skimmer is gonna be BIG - just read a German article about the latest technic overseas making skimmers essentially obsolete. Big $$$ though.
Anything needed - don't forget to holler, Dave!
grouper therapy;588048 wrote: The actual operating cost of a skimmer versus the cost of additional salt and the results of not using one on my present system was what prompted me to try no skimmer . So how much salt do you use with a skimmer? That would help determine the actual difference in cost as well.
Oz;588077 said:Yeah. Hard to quantify. For me, using a good skimmer seems to take crap out of the water quickly so I can go longer between WC's. I'm seeing great PE and growth this year so far. You'll be replacing trace elements constantly which is pretty cool. I'm looking forward to your build.[/QUOT
How often and how much do you change out?
Oz;588189 wrote: 800g system and doing 100g WC's every month right now. May extend that out 2-4weeks.
grouper therapy;588199 wrote: http://www.tunze.com/149.html?&L=1&C=IE&user_tunzeprod_pi1">http://www.tunze.com/149.html?&L=1&C=IE&user_tunzeprod_pi1</a>[predid]=-infoxunter019
Thinking of one of these if I can get the cost down.[/QUOTE]
Sorry click on the tunze mainstream pump
Oz;588201 wrote: I tried 3x400's and could get the PAR and no light column effect so I went with 2x1000 in the lumenmax large reflectors. Thought about 4 x 400's but 2x1000's worked better for me. Great PAR, great light spread, and I can keep the lightrack pretty high off the water for easy access and hot air displacement.
Oz;588203 wrote: Hamilton + Helios 20Ks (and VHO's on the front and back of the rack for dawn/dusk)