tater;1042876 wrote: Brightwell just came out with nitrate and phosphate additives for this very problem. That's probably what you want.
Russ-IV;1042877 wrote: you have them at your store?
btw both pink lemonades are encrusting. what was that other tyree piece i have?
tater;1042878 wrote: No I haven't ordered any yet but I'll see if I can, glad they're doing better. The other piece was a tyree 500 efflo
Russ-IV;1042842 wrote: ive been feeding every other day cyclopeze and oyster feast.
Russ-IV;1042868 wrote: i feed fish TWICE a day
Russ-IV;1042842 wrote: ive been feeding every other day cyclopeze and oyster feast. it held steady .5 ppm nitrate but im losing it again.
i can add another fish, however i am hesitant on what fish to add. i have....
2 mandarin dragonets
1 yellow tang
1 regal tang
1 melenarus wrasse
1 watchman goby
i am all for options considering they are very reef safe.
Catgirl29;1042883 wrote: Sorry - I think we all misunderstood that you were only feeding every other day.
WannabeeaReefKeeper;1042886 wrote: Why not add a clown? Everyone loves a "Circus!"
Wannabee
Crew;1042888 wrote: fish eat cyclopeeze, so I figured one was for fish and the other was for everything else.
Sn4k33y3z;1042908 wrote: You also mentioned cyano being visibly present. I once had an "outbreak" and through some research and through others, I found out I actually had detectable nitrates and phosphates. I was thrown off because the cyano was consuming(fueling) it. Once I treated the cyano and retested, I found out I had 10ppm of Nitrate.
Something to consider...
Russ-IV;1042920 wrote: im assuming by treated you used chemiclean and skimmed it up?
Russ-IV;1042832 wrote: ok so... bare with me because im sure ill be branded a heretic.
what do you think skimmate is? there was an article on live aquaria about it but it fit my hypothesis. it isnt all that oil slick you see at the top of your aquarium. it is non discriminate. your oil slick is not "green poo" either. you are sucking up everything. phyto, excrements, copepods, bristle worms... everything. its just science.
copepods and amphipods need some sort of phyto as do a number of corals and other life. imho it is most aggressive with the lowest form of life. eg phyto. once phyto is out, copepods and other inverts hve to rely on macro algae. turf algae, etc. your cuc cleans up a majority of this. but you killed the first line in the food chain. copepods and amphipods die in dt while they thrive in the fuge just to be sucked up later in the dt. they eat diatoms, detritus etc but you cut off their main food source to thrive.
not only that but you are sucking up trace elements that are replenished with wcs.
pick up any rock in your aquarium and let the powerhead blow it off. see all that trash in the water column? i dont have it. i have white heterotrophs attached in a stringy chain of clear gobs. quite different than the trash i saw before.
also cyano thrives on carbon dosing. we all have cyano. its just to what extent. atm im dealing with a new tank and itll still be around, just like everyone else. but it has to balance via mother nature.
by all means, dont change what you do because of what i am attempting. every system is different and if u have a huge bioload i dont see how the micro and nano fauna will adapt.
commence the burning.
Russ-IV;1042822 wrote: i am skimmerless. that is my point.
id get in to the background of my setup but i dont want to ruffle feathers.
my hypothesis after doing this "test" is that a skimmer creates more nitrates than it removes. crazy right?
thats why i did it this way. i can afford a 1/2 hp chiller but not a skimmer? cmon. the issue i observed with my 220 was 2 things. one, once nitrate got super high it saturated the rocks and the sand bed. it kept leaching it for years. biopellets, vodka, etc.
i got so paranoid i went el natural. i figured if i cycled my tank, threw in a crap ton of zooplankton and phyto that it would take care of the detritus for me. no crabs messing with my lps, no peppermint shrimp scavenging my corals.
i made sure nitrate never hit 20 ppm.
i made a crude ats in place of my skimmer. threw in a dsb in the fuge and just used a gfo reactor for po4.
i knew phyto would cloud my tank up so i figured id use carbon if
DawgFace;1042994 wrote: FYI No3 does not bind to sand or rock.
Last and if your stance is you want more No3 and you subscribe to a skimmer creates more No3 than it removes :doh: .... My light bulb is telling me you should incorporate a skimmer to do with what it is designed not to do or to do in your situation.
Crew;1043008 wrote: Ignoring all of the scientific issues with the process in that article, it makes a pretty strong case for running a skimmer.